A correspondence nominee arrangement authorises a person or organisation to act and make changes on the principal's behalf.
To appoint a nominee the relevant form for appointing a nominee should be completed. Requests for nominee appointments signed with a cross or mark are NOT to be accepted unless there is supportive evidence as to the principal's incapacity. Such evidence may include a Court, Tribunal, Guardianship or Administration Order or other evidence. If there is no supportive evidence, these cases should be thoroughly investigated prior to any appointment. The nominee is required to indicate their acceptance of appointment and their obligations under social security law via written consent. Letters of the appointment are to be sent to both the principal and the nominee. Letters of the cancellation of the nominee appointment are also to be sent to both the principal and the nominee.
Act reference: SS(Admin)Act section 123A-'principal', section 123D Provisions relating to appointments
Policy reference: SS Guide 8.5.3 Responsibilities of Nominee
Whenever there is any question of the principal's capability to consent to the appointment of a nominee or any concerns as to an existing arrangement, the delegate must investigate the situation. Where the principal is deemed incapable of providing consent the delegate must obtain documentary evidence to support any decision to appoint a nominee.
There may be times where a principal is not capable, for example, due to an intellectual/physical constraint or in some cases because the principal is a young child, of consenting to the appointment of a nominee. In these cases, a delegate may appoint a nominee on behalf of the principal, with attention to supporting evidence and where the delegate is fully satisfied that the nominee is required and will act in the principal's best interests. The decision made by the delegate to appoint a nominee in these circumstances must be fully documented.
Where a principal has a psychiatric disability, a nominee can be appointed in these instances where there is a court-appointed arrangement such as a Guardianship Order.
To decide whether a principal is incapable of consenting to the appointment of a nominee, a delegate must have sufficient evidence.
Examples of what may contribute to evidence may be:
There are some instances where the appointment of a nominee may not be the most appropriate option to meet the best interests of the principal.
When responding to a third party requesting information regarding the principal's payments, it may be more appropriate to consider the release of information under IMPLIED CONSENT ARRANGEMENTS rather than by appointing a nominee.
Example: A person has an expected short-term incapability and someone needs to make contact to obtain information on their behalf, such as a hospital social worker rings up the local Centrelink social worker on behalf of a comatose principal, to find out the principal's payment details.
Act reference: SS(Admin)Act section 208(1) Disclosure of information by Secretary
Privacy Act 1988 section 14 Information Privacy Principles: Principle 11 Limits on disclosure of personal information
Policy reference: Office of the Privacy Commissioner Guidelines see Guidelines to Information Privacy Principles 8-11 - Guideline 16 Must consent be express - or is implied consent sufficient?, Guideline 17 Who must consent, and who must obtain that consent?
Last reviewed: 4 May 2009